Panorama bbc12/21/2023 The BBC also apologized for its role in the interview, with director-general Tim Davie saying in a statement that the broadcaster “accepts Lord Dyson’s findings in full.” And in the end, when she died two years later, she was without any form of real protection.” This is a young girl in her mid-30s who has lived this extraordinarily turbulent and difficult time in the public eye, she didn’t know who to trust. I think that Diana did lose trust in really key people. “It’s quite clear from the introduction that I sat in on…that everyone was going to be made untrustworthy. “I do draw a line between the two events,” said Spencer. Towards the end of the program, both Earl Spencer and Patrick Jephson, Princess Diana’s former private secretary, said they believe there is a direct link between that infamous interview and Diana’s death two years later. “In the 25 years since inquiry into Martin Bashir, the BBC has stood by its claim there was no connection between the forged bank statements and the Diana interview,” Ware said. However, Earl Spencer directly contradicted Bashir’s assertion during the program, and it appears that Panorama agrees with Diana’s brother. The findings of both the Panorama and Dyson investigations come less than a week after Bashir resigned from his position as the BBC’s Religion Editor on health grounds.īashir apologized for using the forged documents via a statement to the BBC on Thursday, but maintained that he was still “immensely proud” of the interview, and that the bank statements “had no bearing whatsoever on the personal choice by Princess Diana to take part in the interview.” However, Ware also said that Hall believes he acted in an “open and transparent” manner with the BBC board and that he “gave them all the key facts” at the time. “If we had known at the time, there’s no question that this would have been ruthlessly investigated because they were very hot in the sense of propriety of the organization.”Īccording to Panorama, Hall accepts his investigation “fell well short of what was required” and admits that he was wrong to give Bashir the benefit of the doubt. “We can see now that the false bank statements were, in a sense, the lever that opened the doors to access to Diana,” admitted then BBC Governor Richard Eyre, who was present when Hall delivered his findings. Yet soon after, Hall reported his findings to the BBC board saying that he was “certain that Martin Bashir had not been trying to mislead or do anything improper.” Hall failed to share with the company’s directors that Bashir had shown the forgeries to Earl Spencer and then repeatedly lied to BBC management about it. “Management will have to decide what action, if any, to take privately, or publicly about Bashir, what to do about his contract and how long he should stay on Panorama,” the document read. Ware read from an internal document prepared as part of Hall’s inquiry which stated that there were serious concerns among BBC management about Bashir’s conduct. Panorama also criticized Hall’s inquiry, pointing out that Hall himself questioned Bashir, but failed to corroborate his statements despite being aware that he had lied multiple times about who had seen the faked documents. The results of Lord Dyson’s independent investigation into the 1995 interview were published earlier in the day, finding that the BBC “fell short of the high standards of integrity and transparency which are its hallmark” and that the internal investigation at the time, led by former BBC director general Tony Hall, was “woefully ineffective.” “I still take full responsibility for introducing this man to Diana, but at the end of the day, I had done my due diligence.” “I had warned Diana very clearly ,” Earl Spencer said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |